Added: Eulalio Hott - Date: 24.12.2021 23:09 - Views: 39984 - Clicks: 1855
Relationships: Marriage. Anyone we might marry could, of course, be a little bit wrong for us. We know that perfection is not on the cards. Nevertheless, there are couples who display such deep-seated incompatibility, such heightened rage and disappointment, that we have to conclude that something else is at play beyond the normal scratchiness: they appear to have married the wrong person. How do such errors happen, in our enlightened, knowledge-rich times? We can say straight off that they occur with appalling ease and regularity.
Academic achievement and career success seem to provide no To the man i will marry. Otherwise intelligent people daily and blithely make the move. Given that it is about the single costliest mistake any of us can make it places rather large burdens on the state, employers and the next generation toothere would seem to be few issues more important than that of marrying intelligently.
We ruin our lives for reasons that can be summed up in an essay. They tend to fall into some of the following basic .
All of us are crazy in very particular ways. An urgent, primary task of any lover is therefore to get a handle on the specific ways in which they are mad. They have to get up to speed on their individual neuroses. They have to grasp where these have come from, what they make them do — and most importantly, what sort of people either provoke or assuage them. The very idea that we might not be too difficult as people should set off alarm bells in any prospective partner. The problem is that knowledge of our own neuroses is not at all easy to come by. It can take years and situations we have had no experience of.
They only want a nice evening out. Therefore, we end up blind to the awkward sides of our natures. This problem is compounded because other people are stuck at the same low level of self-knowledge as To the man i will marry are. However well-meaning they might be, they too are in no position to grasp, let alone inform us, of what is wrong with them. Naturally, we make a stab at trying to know them. We go and visit their families, perhaps the place they first went to school. We look at photos, we meet their friends. In a wiser society, prospective partners would put each other through detailed psychological questionnaires and send themselves off to be assessed at length by teams of psychologists.
Bythis will no longer sound like a joke. The mystery will be why it took humanity so long to get to this point. We need to know their attitudes to, or stance on, authority, humiliation, introspection, sexual intimacy, projection, money, children, aging, fidelity and a hundred things besides.
In the absence of all this, we are led — in large part — by what they look like. There To the man i will marry to be so much information to be gleaned from their eyes, nose, shape of forehead, distribution of freckles, smiles… But this is about as wise as thinking that a photograph of the outside of a power station can tell us everything we need to know about nuclear fission. In elaborating a whole personality from a few small — but hugely evocative — details, we are doing for the inner character of a person what our eyes naturally do with the sketch of a face.
Without even noticing that we are doing it, we fill in the missing parts. Our brains are primed to take tiny visual hints and construct entire figures from them — and we do the same when it comes to the character of our prospective spouse. We are — much more than we give ourselves credit for, and to our great cost — inveterate artists of elaboration.
The level of knowledge we need for a marriage to work is higher than our society is prepared to countenance, recognise and accommodate for — and therefore our social practices To the man i will marry getting married are deeply wrong. What at times it seems we actually seek is familiarity — which may well complicate any plans we might have for happiness. We recreate in adult relationships some of the feelings we knew in childhood.
It was as children that we first came to know and understand what love meant. But unfortunately, the lessons we picked up may not have been straightforward. The love we knew as children may have come entwined with other, less pleasant dynamics: being controlled, feeling humiliated, being abandoned, never communicating, in short: suffering.
As adults, we may then reject certain healthy candidates whom we encounter, not because they are wrong, but precisely because they are too well-balanced too mature, too understanding, too reliableand this rightness feels unfamiliar and alien, almost oppressive. We head instead to candidates whom our unconscious is drawn to, not because they will please us, but because they will frustrate us in familiar ways.
One is never in a good frame of mind to choose a partner rationally when remaining single is unbearable. We have to be utterly at peace with the prospect of many years of solitude in order to have any chance of forming a good relationship.
Unfortunately, after a certain age, society makes singlehood dangerously unpleasant. Communal life starts to wither, couples are too threatened by the independence of the single to invite them around very often, one starts to feel a freak when going to the cinema alone. Sex is hard to come by as well. For all the new gadgets and supposed freedoms of modernity, it can be very hard to get laid — and expecting to do so regularly with new people is bound to end in disappointment after Far better to rearrange society so that it resembles a university or a kibbutz — with communal eating, shared facilities, constant parties and free sexual mingling… That way, anyone who did decide marriage was for them would be sure they were doing it for the positives of coupledom rather than as an escape from the negatives of singlehood.
When sex was only available within marriage, people recognised that this led people to marry for the wrong reasons: to obtain something that was artificially restricted in society as a whole. But we retain shortages in other areas. When company is only properly available in couples, people will pair up just to spare themselves loneliness.
Back in the olden days, marriage was a rational business; all to do with matching your bit of land with theirs. It was cold, ruthless and disconnected from the happiness of the protagonists. We are still traumatised by this.
What replaced the marriage of reason was the marriage of instinct, the Romantic marriage. It dictated that how one felt about someone should be the only guide to marriage. No more questions asked. Feeling was triumphant.
Parents might be aghast, but they had to suppose that only the couple could ever know. We have for three hundred years been in collective reaction against thousands of years of very unhelpful interference based on prejudice, snobbery and lack of imagination. To write out charts of pros and cons seems absurd and cold. The time has come for a third kind of marriage. The marriage of psychology. Presently, we marry without any information. We go into it To the man i will marry any insightful reasons as to why marriages fail — beyond what we p to be the idiocy or lack of imagination of their protagonists.
In the age of the marriage of reason, one might have considered the following criteria when marrying:. In the Romantic age, one might have looked out for the following s to determine rightness:. We have a desperate and fateful urge to try to make nice things permanent. We want to own the car we like, we want to live in the country we enjoyed as a tourist. And we want to marry the person we are having a terrific time with. It will make permanent what might otherwise be fleeting.
It will help us to bottle our joy — the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing gold flakes across the sea, the prospect of dinner in a little fish To the man i will marry, our beloved in a cashmere jumper in our arms… We got married to make this feeling permanent.
Unfortunately, there is no causal necessary connection between marriage and this sort of feeling.
Getting married has no power to keep a relationship at this beautiful stage. It is not in command of the ingredients of our happiness at that point. In fact, marriage will decisively move the relationship on to another, very different moment: to a suburban house, a long commute, two small children. The only ingredient in common is the partner. And that might have been the wrong ingredient to bottle. The Impressionist painters of the nineteenth century had an implicit philosophy of transience that points us in a wiser direction. They accepted the transience of happiness as an inherent feature of existence and could in turn help us to grow more at peace with it.
Towards dusk, the sun nearly breaks through the landscape. For a little time, the glow of the sky makes the bare branches less severe. The snow and the grey walls have a quiet harmony; the cold seems manageable, almost exciting. In a few minutes, night will close in. Impressionism is interested in the fact that the things we love most change, are only around a very short time and then disappear.
It celebrates the sort of happiness that lasts a few minutes, rather than years. In this painting, the snow looks lovely; but it will melt. The sky is beautiful at this moment, but it is about to go dark. This style of art cultivates a skill that extends far beyond art itself: a skill at accepting and To the man i will marry to short-lived moments of satisfaction. The peaks of life tend to be brief. The statistics are not encouraging. Everyone has before them plenty of examples of terrible marriages.
They know perfectly well that — in general — marriages face immense challenges. And yet we do not easily apply this insight to our own case. Without specifically formulating it, we assume that this is a rule that applies to other people. The beloved feels like around one To the man i will marry a million.
With such a winning streak, the gamble of marrying a person seem entirely containable. We silently exclude ourselves from the generalisation. But we could benefit from being encouraged to see ourselves as exposed to the general fate. Before we get married, we are likely to have had many years of turbulence in our love lives. No wonder if, at a certain point, we have enough of all that. Part of the reason we feel like getting married is to interrupt the all-consuming grip that love has over our psyches. We are exhausted by the melodramas and thrills that go nowhere.
We are restless for other challenges. Preparing us for marriage is, ideally, an educational task that falls on culture as a whole. We have stopped believing in dynastic marriages.To the man i will marry
email: [email protected] - phone:(263) 509-2477 x 2887
31 s You're With the Person You Should Marry